There is a structural mismatch in UK public procurement. The majority of contract value flows through framework agreements. The majority of supplier effort goes into responding to open tenders. This gap is not accidental. It reflects the information asymmetry between buyers, who know which frameworks they are using, and suppliers, who discover them slowly over years of market participation.
Closing that information gap is worth more to your public sector pipeline than any improvement to your bid writing. Understanding which route to prioritise, and when, is the strategic decision that determines whether your public sector practice generates consistent revenue or occasional wins.
What Framework Agreements Actually Are
A framework agreement is a pre-established contract between a buyer, or group of buyers, and a set of approved suppliers. The framework defines the services, goods, or works that can be purchased from those suppliers, the maximum prices that can be charged, and the conditions under which individual contracts can be placed.
Once a framework is in place, buyers can award contracts to framework suppliers through two mechanisms. They can make a direct award to a single supplier for contracts below a defined value threshold. Or they can run a mini-competition among the framework suppliers on the relevant lot, scoring responses against criteria and awarding to the highest-scoring bidder.
The critical point is that non-framework suppliers cannot participate in either of these routes. A buyer on a framework does not advertise individual contracts on Contracts Finder or Find a Tender. They invite only the framework suppliers. If you are not on the framework, you will never know the opportunity existed.
This is the business case for framework strategy. The contracts that generate consistent public sector revenue for the suppliers who hold framework positions are entirely invisible to the suppliers who do not.
How to find the framework opportunities that are visible on Find a Tender.
What Open Tenders Are and When They Make Sense
An open tender is a procurement exercise advertised to any eligible supplier. The buyer publishes a contract notice on Contracts Finder, Find a Tender, or both. Any business that meets the qualification criteria can submit a response. The highest-scoring submission within the evaluation criteria wins.
Open tenders are the standard route for contracts that fall outside existing frameworks, for buyers who do not hold framework agreements relevant to their requirement, and for procurements whose complexity or novelty means that the buyer wants to see the widest possible market response.
Open tenders make sense for suppliers in three situations. First, when you do not yet hold framework positions in your sector and the open tender represents a route to revenue and track record building. Second, when the specific contract is materially different from what existing frameworks cover and the buyer genuinely needs to go to market openly. Third, when the contract value is below framework thresholds and the buyer is procuring openly for speed and simplicity.
The difficulty with open tenders is competition. Any eligible supplier can respond. For high-profile open tenders in well-populated sectors, fifty or more supplier responses are common. Your probability of winning any individual open tender is low unless you have strong incumbent advantage, a directly relevant track record, or competitive differentiation that is genuinely material in the evaluation.
Why government tenders are often decided before they are published and what to do about it.
The Economics: Why Framework Strategy Outperforms Open Tender Strategy at Scale
The financial logic of framework versus open tender strategy becomes clear when you model the comparison across a twelve-month period.
Assume your organisation can produce fifteen high-quality bid submissions per year with your current resource. If you focus those submissions on open tenders, you are competing in a field of twenty to fifty respondents for each opportunity. Even with good track record and strong writing, a win rate of fifteen to twenty percent is optimistic. You win two to three contracts from fifteen submissions.
Now assume instead that you invest twelve months building framework positions in the two or three frameworks your target buyers use most frequently. You spend the same resources on applications and market engagement rather than tender responses. At the end of that period, the framework positions unlock mini-competition invitations where you are one of four to eight shortlisted suppliers, not one of forty open market respondents. Mini-competition win rates for well-positioned framework suppliers typically run at forty to sixty percent. Two framework positions generating ten mini-competition invitations per year at a fifty percent win rate produce five contract wins.
This is a simplified model. The actual numbers depend on your sector, your track record, and the specific frameworks involved. The directional logic is consistent: at scale, framework strategy produces better win rates and lower cost-per-win than open tender strategy.
How to Identify the Frameworks Your Target Buyers Are Using
Framework intelligence is the foundation of framework strategy. You cannot decide which frameworks to pursue without knowing which frameworks the buyers you want to work with are actually using.
The most direct route is award notice research. Every contract awarded under a framework generates a contract award notice on Contracts Finder or Find a Tender. These award notices typically specify the framework used. Reviewing the award notices published by your target buyers over the past two to three years reveals the frameworks they rely on in practice, not the frameworks they theoretically could use.
Buyers also publish their procurement strategy and contract pipeline documents. Local authorities include procurement strategies in their published governance documents. NHS organisations publish their procurement policies. Central government departments publish commercial pipeline documents. These documents often name the frameworks the organisation uses or plans to use by category.
Direct conversation with procurement contacts at target buyers is the third route. Supplier engagement events, market intelligence sessions, and procurement officer conversations will frequently reveal the procurement vehicle preferences of a buying organisation faster than any amount of desk research.
How CCS frameworks work and what a framework position actually gives you.
Choosing the Right Lot on Multi-Lot Frameworks
Most major public sector frameworks are structured in lots covering different service categories, geographies, or contract value bands. Choosing the right lot or lots to apply for is as important as choosing the right framework.
The common mistake is applying for too many lots. Framework applications require evidence of experience and capability relevant to each lot. Spreading your application across multiple lots with thin evidence for each produces mediocre scores across all of them. Concentrating your application on the one or two lots where your track record is strongest and most directly relevant produces higher scores, better placement, and more mini-competition invitations.
Framework lots are also worth evaluating from a competitive density perspective. A lot with forty-five admitted suppliers is more competitive than a lot with eight. If the framework publishes the number of admitted suppliers per lot, this information should influence which lots you prioritise in multi-lot applications.
Dynamic Purchasing Systems: The Open Access Alternative
Dynamic Purchasing Systems, known as a DPS, are a procurement vehicle that sits somewhere between a framework and an open tender. They differ from frameworks in one critical way: new suppliers can join at any point during the lifetime of the DPS, as long as they meet the qualification criteria. The DPS does not close to new entrants after the initial application window.
For suppliers who have missed an application window for a key framework and are waiting for the next refresh, a DPS in the same category provides an entry route that does not require a four-year wait. For new market entrants and growing businesses, the accessibility of a DPS can be significantly better than a framework that requires years of track record.
Several major procurement consortia operate DPS arrangements in high-volume categories. NHS SBS runs DPS vehicles for specific healthcare categories. Many local authority consortia use DPS models for social care and health providers. Central government uses DPS approaches for rapidly evolving markets where the supplier landscape changes faster than a fixed framework can accommodate.
New opportunity in your sector, straight to your inbox.
Discussion
0 comments
No comments yet. Be the first.